Home › Services › Diverticular disease
Condition
Diverticular disease
Most people meet this diagnosis in a colonoscopy report they did not expect to contain it. In the great majority of cases it describes a normal feature of an ageing bowel rather than a disease that needs treating.
What is the difference between the three words
They mean different things, and the difference is the whole point.
- Diverticulosis means small pouches have formed in the wall of the colon. On its own it causes no symptoms and needs no treatment. It is the commonest finding at colonoscopy
- Diverticular disease is the term used when those pouches cause symptoms. It covers everything from ongoing discomfort without inflammation through to an acute attack
- Diverticulitis means one or more of the pouches has become inflamed or infected. This is the one that causes pain and fever and occasionally needs hospital care
It is strongly age-related, and commoner at every age than most people expect. In a study of people having a first screening colonoscopy, about a third of those aged 50 or under had at least one diverticulum, rising to around six in ten of those over 60. In large national endoscopy records the figure reaches roughly seven in ten people over 80. Older textbook figures put the numbers much lower, but they come from the days before routine colonoscopy. The pouches form where small blood vessels pierce the bowel wall and leave it naturally weaker, and pressure inside the colon pushes the lining out through those points.
Constipation does not cause the pouches, and still should not be ignored
Diverticulosis was explained for years as the product of straining against hard stool. The American College of Gastroenterology's 2026 guideline states plainly that constipation is no longer presumed to cause the pouches to form, and that a laxative is not needed for the pouches themselves.
That is not the same as saying constipation does not matter. The same guideline makes the exception explicit: no laxative is needed unless you have chronic constipation. Straining repeatedly against hard stool raises the pressure inside a colon that already has weak points in its wall, so where constipation is genuinely present it is treated properly rather than left alone. In practice that means a good fibre intake, and where fibre is not enough, a macrogol, commonly known as Movicol or OsmoLax, which is suitable for long-term use. There is more on the chronic constipation page.
What the risk actually is
This is the part most often misunderstood, including in older patient information. Three different numbers get quoted as though they answer the same question, and they do not.
Guidelines used to quote a lifetime risk of developing diverticulitis of 10 to 25 per cent, which is frightening and, it turns out, was based on data collected before colonoscopy was widespread, when only the people who became unwell were ever counted.
A study of 2,222 people whose diverticulosis was found incidentally at colonoscopy, followed over an eleven-year period, showed that 4.3 per cent developed acute diverticulitis, and 1 per cent when a stricter definition was used. The median time to an episode was just over seven years. The A second study that followed people for an average of seven years found almost the same thing, with about 4 in 100 developing diverticular disease. Across a whole lifetime the American College of Gastroenterology's 2026 guideline puts the risk at about 3 to 5 per cent, and tells patients that most older adults have diverticulosis but only a small minority ever develop diverticulitis.
A larger proportion, around 20 to 25 per cent, develop symptoms of some kind that are put down to the pouches. That is a different and much broader endpoint, and most of that group have discomfort, bloating or a change in bowel habit rather than an acute attack.
In other words, for most people a report that says diverticulosis is a description rather than a diagnosis, and the chance of it ever causing serious trouble is small.
If you have already had an episode
The arithmetic changes once diverticulitis has happened, and it is worth knowing honestly. About two in ten people have a second episode within ten years of the first. After a second episode the chance of a third rises to around five in ten. Once someone has had several attacks, further ones remain likely.
The reassuring part sits alongside it. The risk of a complication is highest at the very first presentation and falls with later recurrences, so a repeat attack is generally less dangerous than the one before it rather than more. Needing a permanent colostomy is very unlikely.
Age cuts in both directions here, and the averages above hide it. The younger someone is when diverticulosis or a first attack is found, the more likely they are to have an episode at all and the more likely it is to come back: each additional decade of age at diagnosis lowered the risk of developing diverticulitis by about a quarter in one study, and recurrence fell with age in another. Against that, younger people tend to have less severe episodes, fewer complications and better survival. So someone diagnosed in their forties should read the recurrence figures as an underestimate and the complication figures as an overestimate.
What a flare feels like
Diverticulitis usually announces itself as pain in the lower left side of the abdomen that builds over a day or two and stays put, rather than the crampy pain that comes and goes with irritable bowel syndrome. Fever, nausea and a change in bowel habit often come with it. Some people feel unwell before the pain settles in one place.
In a population study of diverticulitis, 88 per cent of people presented with the uncomplicated form, meaning inflammation confined to the bowel wall without an abscess, a perforation, a narrowing or a connection to another organ. The clinical picture alone is not accurate enough to tell the two apart, which is why a CT scan is used to confirm the diagnosis, particularly at a first presentation.
Diverticular bleeding is a separate event. It is painless, it can be sudden and surprisingly heavy, and it usually stops by itself. It is one of the causes of rectal bleeding and, because of the volume, it is one that often brings people to an emergency department.
When to be seen urgently
Severe or worsening abdominal pain, fever and feeling unwell, inability to keep fluids down or heavy rectal bleeding all need assessment the same day rather than an appointment next week.
How diverticulitis is treated
Mild diverticulitis is often managed at home, with rest, fluids, pain relief and a lighter diet for a few days while symptoms settle. Some people find clear fluids for the first day or two more comfortable. That is about comfort rather than healing, and there is no evidence it makes the inflammation settle faster.
Antibiotics are no longer automatic
Antibiotics were once given to everyone. Four randomised trials involving more than 1,800 patients with mild, left-sided, uncomplicated disease have since been pooled, and antibiotics made little or no difference to survival, to progression to complicated disease, to the need for surgery, to readmission or to recurrence. The 2026 American College of Gastroenterology guideline now suggests against routine antibiotics in low-risk patients with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis.
That is a suggestion about a selected group, not a rule for everyone. Antibiotics remain appropriate where there are high-risk features, where the immune system is suppressed, in frailty and where someone cannot safely be managed at home. A small number of people go on to develop a complication such as an abscess or a perforation, fewer than 1 in 20 over the following year, and when it happens it is usually in the first weeks rather than months later. That is why the first fortnight is the period to watch.
Hospital care is needed when the pain is severe, when fluids will not stay down, when there is a high fever or when a scan shows a complication. The complications are uncommon and include an abscess, a perforation, a connection forming to another organ and narrowing of the bowel from repeated inflammation.
The colonoscopy afterwards
A colonoscopy after recovery is not done for the diverticulitis. It is done because bowel cancer can present in exactly the same way and be misread as an attack. Across 19 studies the rate of colon cancer found after a first diagnosis of diverticulitis was 1.6 per cent, but that risk is not spread evenly. After complicated disease the odds of colon cancer were around six times higher, while after uncomplicated disease the risk was no different from the general screening population.
So a colonoscopy is recommended after an episode of complicated diverticulitis. After an uncomplicated episode it is not automatic, but it can reasonably be considered, and a first episode is the usual point at which it is offered. The case for it is strongest where someone is not up to date with bowel cancer screening or has alarm features such as unintended weight loss, a change in bowel habit, iron deficiency anaemia, blood in the stool or pain that does not settle. It is not performed within six to eight weeks of the attack, because inflammation and swelling make the examination harder and less safe. A recent colonoscopy may mean it is not needed at all.
Surgery
Surgery is reserved for complications and for people whose repeated episodes are genuinely disrupting life. Removing the affected segment reduces recurrence without abolishing it: in the randomised trial of people already being considered for an operation, meaning those with repeated or persistent disease, about six in ten had another episode within two years without surgery against about one in ten after an operation. Recurrence after that operation is uncommon, in the order of one in twenty. Those figures are much higher than the ones quoted earlier for people after a first episode, because it is a different and far more affected group. Modern practice weighs how much the episodes are costing someone rather than counting them, and the decision is made together with a colorectal surgeon.
One thing that is not recommended is taking something long term to prevent the next attack. Probiotics have been looked at and are not recommended for this purpose, and the two prescription medicines most often tried for it are both advised against in the 2026 guideline.
What about diet, and the nuts and seeds question
For decades people with diverticulosis were told to avoid nuts, seeds, corn and popcorn, on the theory that fragments lodged in the pouches. It was advice given confidently and it was never tested.
It has been now. A study of 47,228 men followed for 18 years found that eating nuts, corn and popcorn did not increase the risk of diverticulitis or diverticular bleeding. Nuts and popcorn were in fact associated with a lower risk of diverticulitis. The authors concluded the advice to avoid these foods should be reconsidered, and guidelines have since dropped it.
What does appear to matter is the opposite of restriction. In the EPIC-Oxford study vegetarians had a 31 per cent lower risk of diverticular disease than meat eaters, and people in the highest fifth for fibre intake had a 41 per cent lower risk than those in the lowest. The pattern that comes out of the dietary work is a familiar one: plenty of fruit, vegetables, wholegrains and legumes, with less red meat, processed grain, unhealthy fat and sugar. Fibre from food does the work here. Supplements are not a substitute for the diet itself.
The other things with evidence behind them
- Smoking. Current smokers have around a 36 per cent higher risk of diverticular disease serious enough to require hospital admission, and roughly two and a half times the risk of the complicated form.
- Weight. Being overweight or obese raises the risk, and weight loss is suggested for people who have had an episode.
- Activity. Regular physical activity is associated with a lower rate.
- Alcohol. Heavy intake raises the risk. Moderation is the advice rather than abstinence.
- Anti-inflammatory painkillers. Regular use of non-aspirin anti-inflammatories was associated with about a 70 per cent higher risk of a first episode of diverticulitis. The guideline suggests avoiding regular use after recovery unless there is a clear reason for them. If they were prescribed for something like arthritis, that is a conversation with the doctor who prescribed them rather than a reason to stop on your own. Paracetamol is not in this group.
During an acute flare a lower-fibre diet for a few days is easier on the bowel, and fibre is built back up gradually once things settle. Going back to a high-fibre intake too quickly after an attack can itself cause cramping. That short-term measure is different from a permanent restriction.
What if you have just been told you have diverticulosis
Practically, for most people this is what it means.
- No treatment and no medication are needed for the pouches themselves. The one thing not to leave alone is constipation, if you actually have it. That is managed on its own merits
- No repeat colonoscopy is needed just to look at them. Your surveillance interval is set by whatever else was found, such as polyps
- No foods need avoiding, and a good fibre intake is worth working towards
- Know the warning signs. Persistent pain low on the left with fever is worth being seen for promptly
Ongoing symptoms without inflammation, sometimes called symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease, do occur and overlap heavily with irritable bowel syndrome. Where that is the picture, the treatment follows the IBS approach rather than repeated courses of antibiotics.
The same thing happens after an attack. More than a third of people are left with ongoing bowel symptoms one to two years after an episode of diverticulitis, most often bloating, wind, a feeling of fullness and more frequent stools, and being told the scan is now normal does not make that go away. It is common, it is recognised in the guidelines and it usually responds to the approach used for disorders of gut-brain interaction rather than to further antibiotics or further scans.
Where diverticular disease is assessed in Sydney
A/Prof Viraj Kariyawasam is a consultant gastroenterologist and hepatologist. Diverticulosis found at colonoscopy, and recovery after an episode of diverticulitis, are assessed at consultation in Norwest, Rouse Hill, Pennant Hills and Macquarie Park.
Where a colonoscopy is needed, it is performed at Norwest Private Hospital, Macquarie University Hospital and Pennant Hills Day Surgery. A referral from your GP is needed for a consultation.
Related pages
Common questions
The questions people actually ask, answered plainly.
I have been told I have diverticulosis. Do I need treatment?
No. Diverticulosis on its own needs no treatment and no medication. It is the commonest thing found at colonoscopy and in most people it never causes a problem.
Can I eat nuts, seeds and popcorn?
Yes. A study of 47,228 men followed for 18 years found these foods did not increase the risk of diverticulitis or diverticular bleeding, and nuts and popcorn were associated with a lower risk. The old advice to avoid them has been dropped from guidelines.
What is the chance I will get diverticulitis?
Lower than the figure you may have read. A study of 2,222 people whose diverticulosis was found incidentally at colonoscopy showed 4.3 per cent developed diverticulitis over eleven years, against the 10 to 25 per cent quoted in older guidelines. The 2026 American College of Gastroenterology guideline puts it at roughly 1 to 4 per cent over seven years, and tells patients that fewer than one in ten people with diverticulosis will ever develop it.
I have had one episode. How likely is another?
About two in ten people have a second episode within ten years of the first. If a second one happens, the chance of a third is around five in ten. The risk of a serious complication is highest at the very first attack and falls with later ones, so a recurrence is usually less dangerous than the episode before it.
Will I end up needing a colostomy bag?
Very unlikely. Most people with diverticulitis have the uncomplicated form and serious problems are uncommon. The risk of complications is highest at the first episode, and later attacks are less likely to cause them.
Does constipation cause it, and should I be taking a laxative?
Constipation is no longer thought to cause the pouches to form, and no, you do not need a laxative simply because a report says diverticulosis. The 2026 guideline makes one exception, which is if you have chronic constipation. Straining repeatedly against hard stool raises pressure in a colon that already has weak points, so where constipation is genuinely there it should be managed rather than ignored: a good fibre intake, and where that is not enough, a macrogol such as Movicol or OsmoLax, which is suitable long term.
What does a flare feel like?
Usually pain low on the left side of the abdomen that builds over a day or two and stays in one place, often with fever, nausea and a change in bowel habit. That is different from the crampy, moving pain of IBS.
Do I always need antibiotics?
Not always. Four randomised trials involving more than 1,800 patients found that in mild, uncomplicated, left-sided diverticulitis antibiotics made little or no difference to survival, to progression to complicated disease, to the need for surgery or to recurrence. The 2026 guideline suggests against routine antibiotics in low-risk patients. They are still appropriate where there are high-risk features, where the immune system is suppressed, in frailty or where someone cannot safely be managed at home.
Do I need a colonoscopy after an episode of diverticulitis?
It depends on the episode. After complicated diverticulitis it is recommended, because the odds of finding a colon cancer are around six times higher. After an uncomplicated episode it is considered rather than automatic, and a first episode is the usual point at which it is offered. The case is strongest for people who are not up to date with bowel cancer screening or who have alarm features such as weight loss, a change in bowel habit, iron deficiency or bleeding. It is not done within six to eight weeks of the attack, and a recent colonoscopy may mean it is not needed at all.
Is there anything I can take to stop it coming back?
Nothing with good evidence behind it. Probiotics are not recommended for this, and the two prescription medicines most often tried for it are both advised against in the 2026 guideline. What does have evidence is the unglamorous list: a high-fibre diet built on food rather than supplements, not smoking, a healthy weight, regular activity, moderate alcohol and avoiding regular anti-inflammatory painkillers where there is no clear reason for them.
My scan is normal but I still have symptoms months later. Is that normal?
It is common and it is recognised. More than a third of people report ongoing abdominal pain or altered bowel habit one to two years after an episode of diverticulitis. The usual explanation is not smouldering infection but a change in how the bowel behaves and signals afterwards, and it tends to respond to the approach used for irritable bowel syndrome rather than to more antibiotics or more scans.
Does diverticular disease turn into bowel cancer?
No. The pouches do not become cancer. The reason the two come up together is that an episode of diverticulitis can look like a cancer on a scan and cause the same symptoms, which is why the colon is examined afterwards.
Why was my bleeding so heavy but not painful?
That is typical of diverticular bleeding, which comes from a small artery next to a pouch rather than from inflammation. It can be alarming in volume and it usually stops on its own. It still needs assessing, and heavy bleeding needs emergency care.
Will I need surgery?
Most people never do. Surgery is reserved for complications and for repeated episodes that are disrupting life, and the decision is made together with a colorectal surgeon. It reduces recurrence rather than removing it: in the figures the guideline quotes, about 60 per cent have a further episode within five years without surgery against roughly 15 per cent after an elective resection.
Does fibre help or make it worse?
A higher fibre intake over the long term is associated with a lower rate of diverticulitis. During an acute flare, less fibre for a few days is easier on the bowel, then it is built back up. The short-term measure is not a reason to stay on a low fibre diet.
Did something I ate cause the flare?
Almost certainly not. Diverticulitis is not caused by a particular meal, and looking for the culprit food usually leads to unnecessary restriction. Smoking, obesity, low fibre intake over years and regular anti-inflammatory painkillers are the factors with evidence behind them.
Where these figures come from
- Crowe FL et al. Diet and risk of diverticular disease in Oxford cohort of European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): prospective study of British vegetarians and non-vegetarians. BMJ 2011;343:d4131
- Peery et al, ACG clinical guideline: colonic diverticulitis, American Journal of Gastroenterology 2026
- Peery AF et al. Colonic diverticula are not associated with mucosal inflammation or chronic gastrointestinal symptoms. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;14(7):980-5
- Sharara AI et al. Long-term outcome of incidental colonic diverticulosis. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;2018:3690202
- Tursi et al, Fiesole consensus on the management of colonic diverticular disease, Gut 2026
- Shahedi et al, long-term risk of acute diverticulitis among patients with incidental diverticulosis, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2013
- Strate et al, nut, corn and popcorn consumption and the incidence of diverticular disease, JAMA 2008
- Better Health Channel, diverticulosis and diverticulitis
This page is general information. It is not advice about your own situation, and it is not a substitute for seeing a doctor. If you have symptoms, see your GP.
Make an appointment
Appointments are booked through the rooms directly. Have your GP referral ready when you call or ask your GP to send it ahead. Urgent inflammatory bowel disease, rectal bleeding and positive bowel screening referrals are prioritised.
Norwest & Rouse Hill (02) 8530 1800 Pennant Hills (02) 9875 2311 Macquarie Park (02) 9812 3880